Probevortrag: "The Power of Representation for Clique-Width: Fine-Grained Algorithms for Hard Graph Problems"
Narek Bojikian
- https://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/de/events/probevortrag-the-power-of-representation-for-clique-width-fine-grained-algorithms-for-hard-graph-problems
- Probevortrag: "The Power of Representation for Clique-Width: Fine-Grained Algorithms for Hard Graph Problems"
- 2026-08-19T10:15:00+02:00
- 2026-08-19T23:59:59+02:00
- Narek Bojikian
- Wann 19.08.2026 ab 10:15 Uhr
- Wo RUD25 3.321, online
- Name des Kontakts Prof. Dr. S. Kratsch
-
iCal
Vortragssprache ist Englisch. Geplant sind etwa 45 Minuten Vortrag und bis zu 30 Minuten für Fragen.
Eine Zoom-Einladung erhalten Sie auf Anfrage.
Abstract:
We study the fine-grained parameterized complexity of graph problems parameterized by clique-width (cw). The central theme of this dissertation is that representations of partial solutions can compress the dynamic-programming state space, yielding optimal algorithms under fine-grained complexity hypotheses.
Specifically, we develop three main representation techniques for graph problems parameterized by clique-width:
First, we introduce connectivity and acyclicity representations that result in SETH-optimal single-exponential FPT algorithms for Steiner Tree in time $O^*(3^{cw})$, Connected Odd Cycle Transversal in time $O^*(12^{cw})$, Feedback Vertex Set in time $O^*(6^{cw})$, and Connected Feedback Vertex Set in time $O^*(18^{cw})$, as well as SETH-tight algorithms for Parity Feedback Vertex Set relative to both treewidth ($O^*(3^{tw})$) and clique-width ($O^*(6^{cw})$). These algorithms are complemented by matching SETH-based lower bounds.
Second, we provide a degree-representation technique that results in ETH-tight single-exponential XP algorithms for two degree-constrained spanning tree problems: Degree-Constrained Spanning Tree and Exact Leaf Spanning Tree.
Finally, we show the limits of representation by proving that a straightforward dynamic programming algorithm for the d-Clique Packing problem running in time $n^{O(cw^{d-1})}$ is ETH-optimal for every fixed d >= 3, by providing a lower bound that excludes any algorithm running in time $n^{o(cw^{d-1})}$ under ETH.